-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/24/18 06:24, Eliot Lear wrote: > > > On 24.01.18 12:20, Joe Clarke wrote: >> Is there a reason why they wouldn't be mandatory? Seems like >> these data would be readily available and having them would make >> a number of use case cases possible. > > Yes, there is. If the MUD-URL is "burned in" via 802.1AR and the > software can be updated, then one oughtn't provide software > information for the simple reason that it would be most likely > wrong. Hardware info? Sure. Software when using DHCP or LLDP? > Sure. But otherwise no.
Fair, but why not mandatory then for device-type, model-number, and manuf-name? Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTMiWQHc8wChijkr7lvaI+K/hTPhwUCWmr9TwAKCRBvaI+K/hTP h4UhAJ9C7cFxWuDxndYipyAFnunsWUrllQCfRhK/8Gnk4t7YMM26hCsxUCt3rVY= =eEtq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
