> Just the snark :-). >>> I do think the “awesome” authentication bit might need to come out >>> before ultimate publication, though. >> just the snark, or are you saying the whole auth?
we can negotiate btw, the draft is intended to document and prefer a new geofeed: attribute, not just the interim remarks: hack. e.g. Ideally, RPSL would be augmented to define a new RPSL geofeed: attribute in the inetnum: class. Until such time, this document defines the syntax of a Geofeed remarks: attribute which contains an HTTPS URL of a geofeed file. would you suggest stronger wording? randy _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
