< speaking as a random idiot >

> Let's assume this becomes RFC9999, and I claim I implement/support
> RFC9999. What does that mean? MAY or SHOULD or MUST I support the
> geofeed: attribute?

something such as

   Until all producers of inetnum:s, i.e. the RIRs, state that they have
   migrated to supporting a geofeed: attribute, consumers looking at
   inetnum:s to find geofeed URLs MUST be able to consume both the
   remarks: and geofeed: forms.  This not only implies that the RIRs
   support the geofeed: attribute, but that all registrants have
   migrated any inetnum:s from remarks: use to geofeed:s.

randy

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to