> On Oct 19, 2020, at 13:49, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just the snark :-). >>>> I do think the “awesome” authentication bit might need to come out >>>> before ultimate publication, though. >>> just the snark, or are you saying the whole auth? > > we can negotiate
Not with me. I’d say leave it. Probably with RFC Editor. > > btw, the draft is intended to document and prefer a new geofeed: > attribute, not just the interim remarks: hack. e.g. > > Ideally, RPSL would be augmented to define a new RPSL geofeed: > attribute in the inetnum: class. Until such time, this document > defines the syntax of a Geofeed remarks: attribute which contains an > HTTPS URL of a geofeed file. > > would you suggest stronger wording? When I read that, I assumed that such an attribute would be out of scope of this document and that would be a target of future work to happen in RIPE (perhaps?). If this draft is intended to ALSO propose that, I would clearly describe the intended geofeed: attribute with examples and any additional links to work in RIPE. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
