YANG set a pretty solid IETF precedence here. As an individual, I'd +1 a
too late here.
On 12.11.20 00:40, Michael Richardson wrote:
Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12-Nov-20 10:47, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> We didn’t use the ISE for JSON. Why should we use it here?
> I have no idea what the arguments were for JSON. Carsten already stated
> why the Independent Stream is appropriate for PCAPNG: "PCAPNG is a done
> deal." So there's nothing non-editorial to discuss. Waste of WG time.
Actually, I was going to just go that way, and said so to Eliot on Monday
(?!), and then he posted the message that started the thread.
> If there's a PCAPNGng proposal, bring it here by all means.
Actually, one thing the WG could do is to provide a slightly more sensible
name, as "NG" is always in the future.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
