Hi, folks, As described in RFC8969, network performance monitoring is one Indispensable component of closed loop service lifecycle management. The model defined in draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm is one typical example of network as a service model and NaaS is crucial to service deployment automation. So I support the adoption of this work. Best regards Chongfeng
[email protected] From: Joe Clarke \(jclarke\) Date: 2021-01-29 22:18 To: [email protected] Subject: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm Hello, WG. The draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm (A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring) work has been steadily progressing with the other VPN network model work. This was presented last at IETF 109 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-109-opsawg-a-yang-model-for-network-and-vpn-service-performance-monitoring/), and there has been some recent discussion on list that has been addressed by the authors. We would like to know if the working group wants to formally adopt this work. Please respond with your comments and thoughts on the draft. We will conduct a two week CFA, concluding on February 12, 2021. Joe (on behalf of co-chairs) _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
