Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > While the original pcap format has held up very well over time, a more > modern format is needed for some applications. Pcapng is widely agreed > to be that(*), and publishing a specification that has had input from > the operational community is an important next step. I support WG > adoption of this draft.
> GrΓΌΓe, Carsten
> (*) even if I would have preferred it to use CBOR β but CBOR would have
> had to be around much earlier to enable that choice.
There are a number ways in which I'd like to extend pcapng, and CBOR would
fit nicely them.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IΓΈT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
