Dear OPSAWG members,
this email concludes the call for Working Group Adoption on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-03.
We did not reach a critical mass of positive replies, but there were
also no objections, and various elaborate comments (in addition to
various comments on potential adoption in 2020).
The chairs believe that this work is interesting to adopt, but we also
have to make sure that there is enough commitment wrt contribution and
review. Looking at a list of seven authors, it seems to me that there is
enough involvement to advance this work in OPSAWG.
My recommendation to the authors is to discuss the issue of review
commitment at the IETF 112 meeting's OPSAWG session and we can go from
there.
For the OPSAWG co-chairs,
Henk
On 04.10.21 22:00, Henk Birkholz wrote:
Dear OPSAWG members,
this starts a call for Working Group Adoption of
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-03
ending on Monday, October 18th.
As a reminder, this I-D describes the PCAPng format - the successor of
the PCAP format - retaining the established design patterns and adding
new capabilities as well as a an extensibility feature.
Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments
you may have.
For the OPSAWG co-chairs,
Henk
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
