Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-03

Eliot Lear Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:04:23 -0700

I support the adoption of this draft as well as the pcap draft. My presumption is that we will memorialize pcap and further work might be done on pcapng.


On 21.10.21 21:51, Michael Richardson wrote:

Carsten Bormann<[email protected]>  wrote:
     > While the original pcap format has held up very well over time, a more
     > modern format is needed for some applications.  Pcapng is widely agreed
     > to be that(*), and publishing a specification that has had input from
     > the operational community is an important next step.  I support WG
     > adoption of this draft.


     > Grüße, Carsten

     > (*) even if I would have preferred it to use CBOR — but CBOR would have
     > had to be around much earlier to enable that choice.

There are a number ways in which I'd like to extend pcapng, and CBOR would
fit nicely them.


--
Michael Richardson<[email protected]>    . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide





_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-03

Reply via email to