-----้ฎไปถๅไปถ----- ๅไปถไบบ: Carsten Bormann [mailto:[email protected]] ๅ้ๆถ้ด: 2021ๅนด10ๆ26ๆฅ 15:18 ๆถไปถไบบ: Guy Harris <[email protected]> ๆ้: Qin Wu <[email protected]>; [email protected] ไธป้ข: Re: [OPSAWG] ๐ WG Adoption Call for draft-gharris-opsawg-pcap-02
On 26. Oct 2021, at 09:00, Guy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would vote for "both should point to a common location" so that neither the > pcap nor the pcapng spec says "there is *the* list of link-layer types" - it > points to a registry, and as more types are added to the registry, more specs > can be published define them. Indeed, and running such a registry is exactly what IANA is good at. One way to do this would be to jump-start the process by a short document establishing this registry, with a defined registration policy. (Weโd probably need to be able to point out candidates for the designated experts that will implement this policy to make this approach palatable to IESG.) [Qin] Good proposal, agree with this. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
