Qin Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
    > I am not against this draft. I am just thinking whether Independent
    > submission stream process is a better choice for this document in the
    > first round when WG and IESG have no change control to this work.  Upon
    > this work get published as RFC
    > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/about/independent/), bisdocument can go
    > through WG submission process, if my understanding is correct.

The ISE stream is not permitted to create the pcap link_type registry that we
need, with the desired IANA Considerations.

See 
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gharris-opsawg-pcap-02.html#name-linktype-registry

We had this conversation a year ago, I think.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IΓΈT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to