Qin Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > I am not against this draft. I am just thinking whether Independent > submission stream process is a better choice for this document in the > first round when WG and IESG have no change control to this work. Upon > this work get published as RFC > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/about/independent/), bisdocument can go > through WG submission process, if my understanding is correct.
The ISE stream is not permitted to create the pcap link_type registry that we need, with the desired IANA Considerations. See https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gharris-opsawg-pcap-02.html#name-linktype-registry We had this conversation a year ago, I think. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IΓΈT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
