Hi Adrian,
Thanks again for your helpful review. Please see in line with details. Thanks, Bo > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Adrian Farrel > 发送时间: 2022年3月6日 21:57 > 收件人: 'Joe Clarke (jclarke)' <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > 主题: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service > Performance Monitoring > > Hi, > > I reviewed this draft at -01 [1]. The authors proposed acceptable changes, and > these have appeared in the subsequent revisions. > > As part of WG last call, I have done another quick review. Asides from a few > trivial nits (below), I think this draft is ready for publication. > > Thanks, > Adrian > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/xcSMXTG8Pooi3ypLNyQWEKm7<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/xcSMXTG8Pooi3ypLNyQWEKm7qgg/> > qgg/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/xcSMXTG8Pooi3ypLNyQWEKm7qgg/> > > ==Nits== > > Section 1 para 1 > > This document shouldn't "propose" anything. It should "define". [Bo Wu] Thanks. Fixed. > > --- > > 2.1 > > s/Service Level Agreements/Service Level Agreement/ [Bo Wu] Thanks. Fixed. > > --- > > 3. > > s/the context of layering/the context of the layering/ [Bo Wu] Thanks. Fixed. > > --- > > 3.1 > > s/specified in[RFC8641]/specified in [RFC8641]/ [Bo Wu] Thanks. Fixed. > > --- > > Obviously, draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common is an RFC now. > You can replace the reference and fix CCCC. [Bo Wu] Thanks for catching this. We will fix. > > --- > > leaf measurement-interval { > type uint32; > units "seconds"; > default "60"; > description > "Indicates the time interval to perform PM measurement."; > } > > Is a value of 0 supported? What does it mean? [Bo Wu] Thanks for pointing this out. We will add a constraint of range "1..max" to the node. > > -----Original Message----- > From: OPSAWG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On > Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke) > Sent: 28 February 2022 23:05 > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC: A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service > Performance Monitoring > > Ahead of IETF 113, we'd like to get working group consensus on > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm/. We > are therefore conducting a two-week WG LC on this work. I have also > requested reviews from Yang Docs, Ops, and Routing DIRs. > > Please share you comments and reviews on list. > > WG LC will end on March 14, 2022. > > Thanks. > > Joe > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
