The WG LC is now closed. Tom has provided additional comments, and I still have some outstanding reviews, so I will mark this as pending a revised I-D. I noted no strong opposition to this work during the process.
We are in need of a shepherd for this work. Who is interested? An IPR poll went out with authors responding that there is no known IPR. I have confirmed none has been submitted in Data Tracker. If there is any known IPR, it must be disclosed. Joe On 3/28/22 09:52, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote: > In preparing for IETF 113, I let the close of this slip, but that turns > out to be a good thing. > > During her presentation, Bo called out the authors made a substantive > change in the latest revision to introduce a choice for vpn-pm-type. > Therefore, we are extending LC for another week to close on Monday, > April 4, 2022. > > Joe > > On 2/28/22 18:05, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote: >> Ahead of IETF 113, we'd like to get working group consensus on >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm/. We >> are therefore conducting a two-week WG LC on this work. I have also >> requested reviews from Yang Docs, Ops, and Routing DIRs. >> >> Please share you comments and reviews on list. >> >> WG LC will end on March 14, 2022. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Joe >> > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
