From: OPSAWG <[email protected]> on behalf of Benoit Claise <[email protected]> Sent: 25 March 2022 10:57
Dear OPSAWG chairs, As discussed during the WG session, the authors believe the two draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance drafts are ready for WGLC. <tp> May be. This is the first module I can recall where the prefix is longer than any of the identifiers that are prefixed. 'service-assurance-interface:' does not make for an easy read IMHO. Several places have an unfinished look. - RFC xxxx: Title to be completed - TO DO - Better type ... - TLP ood - YANG import no reference clause - line length in excess of 100 characters - NMDA not mentioned - string with no indication of acceptable characters sometimes attracts a DISCUSS - mailto:[email protected] Tom Petch Regards, Benoit On 3/25/2022 11:48 AM, Jean Quilbeuf wrote: > Hi Joe, > Thanks for your comments. > > I updated the draft with some more details about the relation between > healt-score and health-score-weight. > > I left the counter so far, but changed it to 64 bits. > > Best, > Jean > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday 24 March 2022 12:42 >> To: Benoit Claise <[email protected]>; Jean >> Quilbeuf <[email protected]>; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance- >> yang-02 >> >> On 3/24/22 08:21, Benoit Claise wrote: >>> Hi Joe, >>> >>> On 3/24/2022 11:48 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote: >>>> On 3/9/22 11:13, Jean Quilbeuf wrote: >>>>> Hi Joe, >>>>> Thanks for your comments. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> First, what is the purpose of assurance-graph-version? It's a 32-bit >> counter that can increment when something goes in and out of maintenance >> (+2). I can easily see this wrapping fir services with a lot of churn. >> What is the >> impact of that? Is this version number required if we have a last modified >> timestamp? >>>>> The purpose of assurance-graph-version is to enable a consumer of this >> module to quickly check if they have the last version. It probably makes >> sense to use a larger counter. I'll modify it. >>>> How does it do that. If I get a version of 324523457273456, how do I >>>> know that's the latest? >>> MdT on-change. >> Fair. But then, as a consumer, I know it's the latest because it's the >> update I >> just got. And still, the date will be more useful... >> >> I know I'm being difficult and bike-sheddy. It doesn't really bother me. >> Just >> trying to make sure there's true use for it. >> >> Joe >> > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > . _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
