Hi Joe,

good points.

I’m not so sure about this one, though:

> On 14. Apr 2022, at 23:38, Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> * Your example in Section 5.1 also uses the "ol" extension.  I think you 
> should omit that in this draft for better clarity.

I think it would be good to show how these extensions work together.
(It probably would also be good to spend some explanatory text on this.)

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to