On 4/14/22 18:44, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Hi Joe, > > good points. > > Iām not so sure about this one, though: > >> On 14. Apr 2022, at 23:38, Joe Clarke (jclarke) >> <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> * Your example in Section 5.1 also uses the "ol" extension. I think you >> should omit that in this draft for better clarity. > I think it would be good to show how these extensions work together. > (It probably would also be good to spend some explanatory text on this.)
Text would be needed for sure, but that would then necessitate an inform reference to the OL draft. And that one is about ready to fall off. I like that work, and I'd like to see it expand a bit more from MUD, but I'm not sure what it's future holds. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
