[email protected] wrote: > Noted for the second point. However, I think there is more than > mirroring the table. I remember that we discussed deprecating values > (?) and ensuring some consistency for future assignments vs. the > historic range.
In what way is the draft unclear about how things would go forward? I don't know that we can effectively deprecate anything; but we could certainly try. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
