On Apr 25, 2024, at 12:04 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> Other than fixing a bug in Table 3.1, I thought that we were close to the
> WGLC.
>
> However, I checked
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype&url_2=https://IETF-OPSAWG-WG.github.io/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype.txt
> and I'm afraid that your main copy override many changes agreed in the past.
> May be I'm not looking in the right branch?
The changes I see from that link are:
1) an unreadable table becomes readable, which is presumably what
"fixing a bug in Table 3.1" refers to (although that's Table 1 in *Section*
3.1);
2) removal of the "Guidance for Designated Experts" section;
3) replacement of the "Contributors" section with "Insert pcap
developers etc. here";
4) replacement of the "Acknowledgments" section with "The authors wish
to thank (many reviewers) and many others for their invaluable comments.".
In the Git repository for the pcaplinktypes, pcap, and pcapng drafts, the
initial commit for draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype.md is
commit 94d418970231e887ae24c233f4fc58862abe15d0
Author: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri Jul 29 17:01:43 2022 -0400
create new document pcaplinktype, reference it
and that has the "fill in this field" versions of "Contributors" and
"Acknowledgments". All subsequent commits have messages that indicate minor
changes.
Michael, what was the source from which the current I-D at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype
was generated, and should the "Guidance for Designated Experts",
"Contributors", and "Acknowledgments" sections be copied from that version to
the current version in the repository?
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
