On Apr 25, 2024, at 1:02 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Guy Harris <[email protected]>
>> Envoyé : jeudi 25 avril 2024 09:53
...
>> The changes I see from that link are:
>>
>> 1) an unreadable table becomes readable, which is presumably
>> what "fixing a bug in Table 3.1" refers to (although that's Table
>> 1 in *Section* 3.1);
>>
>
> [Med] The formatting is better, but the content isn't! For example, there
> were many entries that was agreed to tag them as deprecated but that tagging
> is now lost.
I've put the "(deprecated)" text into the IETF-OPSAWG-WG/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap
GitHub repository in 119ff81379ce1e9de5b58d3c7d77a352f5d72615.
>> 2) removal of the "Guidance for Designated Experts" section;
>>
>
> [Med] ACK. This one should be reinserted back per a discussion we had in the
> past.
I've put that into the repository in a110d2f33f44a9322db8c007552cbdb5b439e820.
I'm not sure where the -02 draft came from; I don't see any commits to
draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype.md that added it, prior to mine.
>> 3) replacement of the "Contributors" section with "Insert
>> pcap developers etc. here";
>>
>> 4) replacement of the "Acknowledgments" section with "The
>> authors wish to thank (many reviewers) and many others for their
>> invaluable comments.".
Those appear to be left over from when the link types were in
draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap.md, as the first of them mentions the pcap developers.
A exhaustive list of all the contributors to the list of pcap types would
probably be exhausting as well.
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
