Hi Joel, > if the third citation is factually incorrect in some fashion it should be > dropped. > > [Waters2011] provides an example of how this could be achieved > using publicly available tools (besides incorrectly claiming the > discovery of a "0day vulnerability").
If the reference is deemed of value to the draft, I (as author of the reference) can reproduce it at another location minus all the 0day nonsense put in there by the "editors" at Infosec Institute. alec -- _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
