On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Alec Waters <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Joel, >> >>> if the third citation is factually incorrect in some fashion it should be >>> dropped. >>> >>> [Waters2011] provides an example of how this could be achieved >>> using publicly available tools (besides incorrectly claiming the >>> discovery of a "0day vulnerability"). >> >> If the reference is deemed of value to the draft, I (as author of the >> reference) can reproduce it at another location minus all the 0day nonsense >> put in there by the "editors" at Infosec Institute. > > <no hat> > Personally I think that that would be useful, although another option would > be for Fernando to remove the somewhat snide parenthetical… > </no hat> Sorry, this was spooled in a mail queue from a while back…. W >> >> alec >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> OPSEC mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec >> > > -- > "When it comes to glittering objects, wizards have all the taste and > self-control of a deranged magpie." > -- Terry Pratchett > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec > -- "Let's just say that if complete and utter chaos was lightning, he'd be the sort to stand on a hilltop in a thunderstorm wearing wet copper armour and shouting 'All gods are bastards'." -- Rincewind discussing Twoflower (Terry Pratchett, The Colour of Magic) _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
