On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Alec Waters <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Joel, > >> if the third citation is factually incorrect in some fashion it should be >> dropped. >> >> [Waters2011] provides an example of how this could be achieved >> using publicly available tools (besides incorrectly claiming the >> discovery of a "0day vulnerability"). > > If the reference is deemed of value to the draft, I (as author of the > reference) can reproduce it at another location minus all the 0day nonsense > put in there by the "editors" at Infosec Institute. <no hat> Personally I think that that would be useful, although another option would be for Fernando to remove the somewhat snide parenthetical… </no hat> > > alec > -- > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec > -- "When it comes to glittering objects, wizards have all the taste and self-control of a deranged magpie." -- Terry Pratchett _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
