> I don't particulary object to having a RFC out there that says "it can > be done, but this is just one option, and drawbacks exist" - which the > text does. I just won't ever *do* that.
the problem is that the naive will fall into the hole. hence my assertion that it needs the toxic warning. _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
