On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Ted Lemon wrote:
Thanks, that's exactly the detail I was missing. It's obvious in
hindsight, but didn't jump out at me based on Randy's comment. :}
2.3 in the draft:
"Interface ping: if an interface doesn't have a routable address, it
can only be pinged from a node on the same link. Therefore, it is
not possible to ping a specific link interface remotely."
So I don't really understand what Randy has against this document and what
other warnings he wants to have in it. What is this "toxic" warning Randy
wants? Randy, please enlighten me?
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
