> I'm, again, not arguing FOR this configuration, just saying you could > make it work, at a price of longer outages (most likely) and more > (much MUCH more) complexity in your operations. I don't see what LLA > gets you that: > 1) put all your ptp/loops into 1 aggregate > 2) do not announce the aggregate (internally (see schilller paper) > nor externally) > 3) acls on the edge that drop traffic destined to your ptp/loops addresses. > > complexity is going to cause you pain, it is going to cause you > problems and it is going to lengthen outages :( avoid complexity.
agree. hence i am of the opinion that the class of configuration in the draft should be clearly labeled as dangerous and ill-advised. though you might be arguing for its use by masochists and isps who want to lose customers. :) randy _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
