On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Joe Touch wrote: > On 10/13/2014 12:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > ... > > Exactly. I believe this draft, and the options draft, are *exactly* what > > the IETF should do (and why we have an E in our name instead of an S; > > we are not the Internet Standards Task Force). If our standards are > > unrealistic, we should be the ones to do something about it... > > If it's that our standards are unrealistic, it would be useful to > address this as changes to the standards.
That's what RFC 7045 does; it has "Updates: 2460, 2780" on its front page. Similarly, draft-gont-6man-ipv6-opt-transmit (the options draft referred to above) has "Updates: 2460 (if approved)" in its front page. //cmh _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
