On 10/13/14 1:03 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > > > On 10/13/2014 12:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > ... >> Exactly. I believe this draft, and the options draft, are *exactly* what >> the IETF should do (and why we have an E in our name instead of an S; >> we are not the Internet Standards Task Force). If our standards are >> unrealistic, we should be the ones to do something about it... > > If it's that our standards are unrealistic, it would be useful to > address this as changes to the standards.
It's not entirely unrealistic to expect a consensus about observed reality to emerge from ops before it evolves into protocol maintenance. The working groups remit doesn't involve changing standards so frankly that's right out. joel > Joe > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
