On 10/13/2014 10:33 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > On 10/13/14 1:03 PM, Joe Touch wrote: >> >> >> On 10/13/2014 12:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> ... >>> Exactly. I believe this draft, and the options draft, are *exactly* what >>> the IETF should do (and why we have an E in our name instead of an S; >>> we are not the Internet Standards Task Force). If our standards are >>> unrealistic, we should be the ones to do something about it... >> >> If it's that our standards are unrealistic, it would be useful to >> address this as changes to the standards. > > It's not entirely unrealistic to expect a consensus about observed > reality to emerge from ops before it evolves into protocol maintenance.
Observed reality doesn't include recommendations. And if observed reality requires consensus, I doubt you're describing anything that involves either observation or reality. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
