On 6/10/20, 5:42 AM, "OPSEC on behalf of Warren Kumari"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:18 AM tom petch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: OPSEC <[email protected]> on behalf of Ron Bonica
<[email protected]>
> Sent: 05 June 2020 16:04
> To: OPSEC
> Subject: [OPSEC] Call For Adoption: draft-camwinget-opsec-ns-impact
>
> Folks,
>
> This email begins a call for adoption on
draft-camwinget-opsec-ns-impact<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-camwinget-opsec-ns-impact/>.
The call for adoption will end on 6/19/2020.
>
> Support
>
> I would have liked this to be a TLS document but the fact that it is not
makes it even more important that it is adopted.
Actually, that raises an important point -- why is it *not* a TLS
document? Are we wading into deep waters here? Did TLS object to this
document, or just show no interest, or say "'tis a fine idea, but too
operational for here, vaya con dios"?
[NCW] It is the latter, that is, it is more about the operational impacts of
network security. When it was presented at the TLS WG,
It was noted that the draft presented TLS use cases but from an operational
perspective and didn't fit with their current charter.
There were suggestions that opsec could be a better fit.
Can this CfA be CCed to the TLS WG so that we get more review?
W
>
> Tom Petch
>
> Ron and Jen
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
--
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
---maf
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
