On 28/07/2020 00:48, Eric Wang (ejwang) wrote: > We felt the lack of a > baseline bcp is going to hurt the security posture of TLS rather than > driving the intermediary away.
That makes no sense to me. Adopting this draft will require eliminating all such gibberish and instead finding text that can garner IETF consensus. I really do not think that effort is worth the significant cost for anyone involved, pro-MITM or not. S.
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
