Done ;) http://orchard.codeplex.com/workitem/18130 * Dario Solera*
On 18 September 2011 23:04, Bertrand Le Roy <bertrand.le....@microsoft.com>wrote: > To Orchard.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* dario.sol...@gmail.com [mailto:dario.sol...@gmail.com] *On Behalf > Of *Dario Solera > *Sent:* Sunday, September 18, 2011 9:59 AM > > *To:* orchard-discuss@lists.outercurve.org > *Subject:* Re: Localization Files Question**** > > ** ** > > You mean filing a bug to Orchard or to GNU's docs? > * > Dario Solera* > > > **** > > On 18 September 2011 18:49, Bertrand Le Roy <bertrand.le....@microsoft.com> > wrote:**** > > I agree. Would you mind filing a bug?**** > > > > Sent from my TI-99/4A**** > ------------------------------ > > *From: *Dario Solera > *Sent: *Sunday, September 18, 2011 5:41 AM**** > > > *To: *orchard-discuss@lists.outercurve.org**** > > *Subject: *Re: Localization Files Question**** > > ** ** > > I see, thanks for the info. I have to say that I still think that msgctx > should be used for disambiguation, but the .po format is not exactly a > standard and has a lots of different implementations. GNU's docs on gettext > are incomplete at best. > > Thanks! > * > Dario Solera* > > > **** > > On 18 September 2011 08:11, Bertrand Le Roy <bertrand.le....@microsoft.com> > wrote:**** > > #: is what we use for context.**** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* dario.sol...@gmail.com [mailto:dario.sol...@gmail.com] *On Behalf > Of *Dario Solera > *Sent:* Saturday, September 17, 2011 10:48 PM**** > > > *To:* orchard-discuss@lists.outercurve.org**** > > *Subject:* Re: Localization Files Question **** > > **** > > Uhm, I don't see any msgctx line... Are you referring to #: comments (which > are the only thing that changes)? > * > Dario Solera* > > **** > > On 17 September 2011 19:20, Bertrand Le Roy <bertrand.le....@microsoft.com> > wrote:**** > > Ho Dario, > > They •are• disambiguated by context. > > Cheers, > Bertrand > > Sent from my TI-99/4A**** > ------------------------------ > > *From: *Dario Solera > *Sent: *Saturday, September 17, 2011 7:32 AM > *To: *orchard-discuss@lists.outercurve.org > *Subject: *Localization Files Question**** > > **** > > Hi there, > I've not been very active here. Just to give a bit of background, my > company builds a platform for localizing software. One of our users wanted > to help translating Orchard to Farsi (fa-IR) using our platform. > > Our .po codec encountered duplicate msgids in the orchard.core.po file and > gave up. That is the expected behavior as far as we're concerned, and I > personally verified that there are duplicate msgids in the file (e.g. "The > Orchard Team" or "Ascending" and many others - full list is below). So the > question is, are those entries supposed to be duplicated, or was it a > mistake on your side? > > To go into further detail, as far as we know, .po files should *not* > contain duplicate msgids unless they're disambiguated with msgctx tags, but > at this point given the large number of duplicate entries I'm starting to > challenge our assumption. > > Can anyone shed some light on this issue? > > Thanks everyone! > > File 'Core/App_Data/Localization/fa-IR/orchard.core.pot' contains duplicate > keys: 'The Orchard Team'; 'http://orchardproject.net'; 'Date Created'; > 'Delete'; 'Navigation'; 'Reports'; 'Default Page Size'; 'Show paging > controls'; 'Order by'; 'Date Published'; 'Title'; 'Slug'; 'Custom 1'; > 'Custom 2'; 'Custom 3'; 'Ascending'; 'Descending'; 'Cannot edit content'; > 'Edit'; 'View'; ' | '; 'Create New Content'; 'Publish Now'; 'Unpublish'; > 'Settings'; 'General'; 'Dashboard'; 'Position'; 'Menu text'; 'This is a > table of the reports in your application'; 'Date'; 'Add'; 'Save'; 'Invalid > user name'; 'Owner' > * > Dario Solera***** > > **** > > ** ** > > ** ** >
