On Oct 5, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > Since origami is not required for survival or meeting basic needs, there > should be absolutely no sense of entitlement that gives the consumer any > right to dictate price,licence , or distribution.
Entertainment is very much a basic need. Creation is too. And _because_ we live in a consumption society, consumers are raised to have a very strong sense of entitlement regarding what they consume. That's in fact why "illegal" distribution exists. Because consumers are sick of being treated like cash cows. In the market place, if sellers don't have a sense that they need to meet consumer's expectations, they're very likely to fail. Unless they are pioneers and they create the expectation. But as far as origami diagrams are concerned that's not going to happen, at least not in the current form. Jean-Christophe Helary ---------------------------------------- fun: http://mac4translators.blogspot.com work: http://www.doublet.jp (ja/en > fr) tweets: http://twitter.com/brandelune
