This was not neccessarily a request for the explaination of MVC or CVM or
VCM or whatever :) Many people learn by example, and this example will cause
newbies to put their code in the JSP if they don't already know MVC. I
think it is up to the more knowledgable folks to lead us less knowledgable
down the correct path, whether they explain all of the reasons is up to the
ammount of time the writers have. This article is VERY good, and I learned
alot from it. Just please be sure you are using "best practices" when
writing a tutorial. You never know if those little eyes are watching :)
--Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christian Sell
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 3:11 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: JSP vs Servlet
> Anyway, IMHO adding a methodology on top of the purpose of the article -
> showing the CMP stuff - would have been yet more to learn. I'm of the
> opinion that something like that needs to show off one aspect of the
> technology rather than all aspects, so MVC - while useful - would have
> been yet another thing to track.
and then he would have had to decide which methodology to use. They all
speak of MVC, but nowadays almost everyone seems to have his/her own idea of
how to implement it. There are so many frameworks out there (e.g., Turbine,
Struts, WebWork, WebMacro, Freemarker, Velocity, to name but a few) that it
is hard to keep track, IMO.
