Just a few notes to this memo:
   1. Someone on this list used openJMS (www.openjms.org) with Orion, and has good 
success, after they positioned some Jar files, etc.
   2. As far as teaching students, I have learned on Orion and Jboss/Tomcat.  Orion is 
free to developers and non commercial use, and Jboss/Tomcat is free (www.jboss.org).
   3. Resin is good, if all you want is a JSP/servlet engine.  If you want an EJB 
engine, then Resin will tell you how to hook up with popular EJB engines (both 
commercial and open source).
   4. Large companies have the perception that the more you pay, the better the 
product.  You do get some nice features with paying the big money: Nice front end 
tools, good documentation, and paid support.  But from what people report in the lists 
(Orion, Jboss, Jonas), the support is not necessary superior to knowledgeable people 
answers questions via the list.
   5. Apache and Tomcat are slated to use OpenEJB in the future (www.openejb.org).

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Rimmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:04 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: Developers


    Inline...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Burr Sutter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: Developers


> Thank You Juan, Ray and Randy
>
> I guess the initial question was a little vague but I like to hear
people's
> opinions. After the download and simple install I was able to add a Sybase
> ASA database as a DataSource, connect to it via JSP and add a simple
custom
> taglib to the default-web-app which proves to me that this thing at least
> works. My next tests include setting up my own web-app and playing around
> with EJB and JMS if I get the time.  Overall it seems to be a good
product.

    While the EJB implementation is quite nice the JMS implementation is
lacking to say the least.  Look in the archive for messages from me in this
regard.

> I like how it picked up on the change I made to make the news.ear demo
code
> function automatically.
>
> As I assume you know Allaire/JRun was purchased by Macromedia. Perhaps the
> marriage with Dreamweaver/UltraDev will payoff.  I've never looked hard at
> JRun since most of my customers typically will pay the big bucks for a
> "brand-name" product like WebSphere, WebLogic or SilverStream but some
want
> to keep the cost of licenses very low at times.
> I'm not sure about Resin at this time. It seems to ship with source code
> which is cool but it seems to be C code, not Java.

    The C code is the connector for Apache, etc.  Resin's a Java product and
the Java source is part of the distribution.

> I also teach Java and J2EE classes and we've been looking for an engine
for
> student machines that is fairly easy to install and configure. Tomcat
works
> for JSP but lacks the EJB, JNDI and JMS support needed.

    JNDI should be fine as well.  JMS, well...

> SilverStream 3.7 has been certified for J2EE and it seems to be very
solid.
> I spent several days with about 20 other people putting it through some
> exercises.
> Weblogic is great but has to be restarted a lot to make some code changes
> (5.1).

    This has lessened greatly with v6.0 but of course it's in BETA and only
for Win32 and Solaris.

> WebSphere doesn't seem to fully understand the proper directory structure
of
> a web-app and the use of WARs completely and it is VERY slow on my NT box
to
> startup and build/deploy simple JSPs.

    WebSphere's a glorified servlet engine.  For really exercising J2EE I'd
stay away.

> Any need to restart Orion after a change to:
> JSP
> EJB
> JMS queue or topic
> Bean for a JSP
> Taglib classes, .tld, .xml
> .war, .ear, .jar?

    I don't really remember but the startup time for Orion is so small it's
not that big a deal (at least for instruction).  Startup time's nothing like
WebLogic that's for sure.

> Thanks,
> Burr
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<snip>

---
Jason Rimmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to