On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 19:11 +0000, Lukas Zeller wrote: > I have a customer report indicating that the change made with > c3ad24c31d (engine: statistics workaround for servers not sending > status 201 for completed adds) sometimes confuses mobical.net and > causes it to return status 400 for attempts to add items to the > server. Not always, but sometimes. > > So far I was not aware of <Add> from client being a potential issue > with mobical - so my question: did anybody experience spurious status > 400 rejects while testing with mobical? I could not reproduce the case > so far (havent tried too hard, either).
We have seen occasional failures with Mobical in our nightly testing. It's too early to tell whether it is related to this particular patch. Yongsheng is looking into it and will report once we know more. I just wanted to give a quick (okay, late...) heads up that we are investigating. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list [email protected] http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
