On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 15:36 +0000, Lukas Zeller wrote: [server admin data] > Yes, it would bypass the API, but unlike with binfiles, in the server > case YOU are the provider of the storage for that admin data, and how > the fields are stored is under YOUR control, and not a secret of the > SyncML engine. So I'd guess it is ok to have a look at them (or even > modify them - such as setting resumeAlertCode to zero to prevent a > resume, or blank out the anchor to force a slow sync).
So the format is part of the API? I guess it has to be even though it is not documented (or is it?), because changes to it would break server software upgrades. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
