On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 15:03 +0530, Sachin Gupta wrote: > Hi Lukas/Patrick, > > > I have to run some test cases using syncevolution as client to test a > SyncML server performance. Expectation is to put load of around 2500 > users syncing concurrently for an hour.
That's a bit vague. What kind of changes are supposed to be synced during that hour? The load will depend a lot on that. At the low end you just have 2500 users connecting repeatedly without data changing on client or server. The high end is open-ended; lots of items and slow syncs will be more expensive than few items and incremental changes. > Can you suggest how i can test SyncML Server performance and have 2500 > users/syncevolutions connecting simultaneously? There's no ready-made solution. You'll have to write your own scripts for configuring SyncEvolution and running the desired benchmark. Note that each context in SyncEvolution gets its own device ID. So if you want to simulate n different devices, use: syncevolution --configure ... client-1@client-1 ... syncevolution --configure ... client-n@client-n -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
