On Sat, 2014-04-26 at 23:42 +0530, Sachin Gupta wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 15:03 +0530, Sachin Gupta wrote: > > > Can you suggest how i can test SyncML Server performance and have 2500 > > > users/syncevolutions connecting simultaneously? > > > > There's no ready-made solution. You'll have to write your own scripts > > for configuring SyncEvolution and running the desired benchmark. > > > > Note that each context in SyncEvolution gets its own device ID. So if > > you want to simulate n different devices, use: > > > > syncevolution --configure ... client-1@client-1 > > ... > > syncevolution --configure ... client-n@client-n > > > I figured so. So wrote scripts which will launch syncevo each with > unique device ids and seperate user accounts. > But the concern is managing these number of syncs through a time > period. Exploring if JMETER can help me out in this.\ > Also being a process, it would not be possible to launch so many > processes in parallel. > Memory and CPU would be issues, right? Would need very high end > systems for this?
I have not measured this. Try it and you'll see. My expection is that you will need multiple client machines, though. > Would it be possible doing this launching processes or shall i look > into creating threads within the Syncevolution launching and > controlling sessions from there? I would just use multiple client machines. Much simpler and scales perfectly. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list [email protected] http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
