J Aaron Farr wrote:
If that's the case, then a name change as Alex suggested may be in order. It will avoid this type of confusion.
But, from my perspective, it will just create another source of confusion, which is for the user community of Oscar and OSGi frameworks in general. I am more concerned with the users than the politics. In the end, I think it serves people less to have a new project with unclear history and a dead project called Oscar, than to just have a single project called Oscar.
Regardless, we can change the name if that is the consensus. -> richard
