On 26. Jul 2005, at 17:52, Richard S. Hall wrote:
J Aaron Farr wrote:
If that's the case, then a name change as Alex suggested may be in
order. It will avoid this type of confusion.
But, from my perspective, it will just create another source of
confusion, which is for the user community of Oscar and OSGi
frameworks in general. I am more concerned with the users than the
politics. In the end, I think it serves people less to have a new
project with unclear history and a dead project called Oscar, than
to just have a single project called Oscar.
I agree with this.
People have gotten comfortable with Oscar. They know Oscar is good
stuff. It would not be very smart to change the project name.
Timur
