On Wednesday 27 July 2005 02:04, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Le 26 juil. 05, à 17:52, Richard S. Hall a écrit : > > ...In the end, I think it serves people less to have a new project > > with unclear history and a dead project called Oscar, than to just > > have a single project called Oscar.... > > Agreed, saying "Oscar 1 was hosted at ObjectWeb and newer releases are > hosted at the ASF" is clear enough IMHO.
Hasn't there been similar transfers in the past. IIRC, Log4J was Log4J long time before it got to ASF. I am in favour of keeping Oscar as a name; * Continuum * Short and easy to pronounce. * Acronym-friendly ;o) Will the Academy Awards be an issue?? They are in "entertainment", so I think not...IANAL. Cheers Niclas
