Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Using a different name sounds good, as it will avoid for sure mixing
of files between incompatible versions. Now it may be better to use
Oscar's version number rather than the spec's revision as
incompatibilities are more related to oscar itself than to the spec.
So what about ~/.oscar-2?
I don't prefer version in the name because it implies that we should
change it as the version of Oscar changes, but this may not be necessary
at all. For example, what if Oscar 2.5 or 3.0 is compatible? Not only
that, but in most cases I try really hard to make things backwards
compatible.
However, it is more likely that for R5, bundles will not be compatible
with R4, so it is okay to separate the profiles into ~/.oscar-r5 when
that happens.
-> richard
