--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 06:02:51PM -0600, Jason B. wrote:
> Per Jeff's suggestion, I tried recompiling.  While I could not successful=
ly=20
> recompile mpich, I could recompile lam and I was able to run the lam test=
=20
> successfully.  Maybe we should offer two versions of some of these=20
> libraries... one using 2.9x and one using 3.x?  OTOH, newer distros have=
=20
> compat- type packages which provide the older binaries and libraries (and=
=20
> headers, etc.).  Any suggestions on what we should do?

Have you tried compiling MPICH against the lsb libraries?  Try installing
the lsbdev package on RH 8.0 and check out its docs.

        -Sean

--=20
_______________________________________________________________________
                        =09
Sean Dague                [EMAIL PROTECTED]               http://dague.net

There is no silver bullet.  Plus, werewolves make better neighbors than
zombies, and they tend to keep the vampire population down.
_______________________________________________________________________

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+Ncq/SamXem9TdyYRAtKfAKCpkNBSoUs+77qeB8evAFcRo9qVzQCfcy7Z
wsK454eur74WktZbkMsW3/s=
=hgC0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel



Reply via email to