From: Jeff Squyres; Wednesday, January 05, 2005 6:00 AM >To: OSCAR-devel >Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] [ oscar-Bugs-1084690 ] (FC2) ntpd pemission >warning on client nodes > >On Jan 5, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > >>> We should define "works" as "allows ntp two operate." >> >> Hmm. Not sure I agree with that. >> >> ntp will operate properly even if there is no valid server (i.e., >> it'll just keep the head node and client nodes in sync). > >Oops -- let me re-phrase that:
No need. We're in agreement; you're (correctly) being crisper in your wording. All along, I was thinking of checking if ntp was synching with a higher-level stratum. >I seem to recall that this does *not* cause an error -- meaning that >the ntpd's will all happily be running, but they don't actually >synchronize to anyone We can get the compute nodes to synch to the head node, even if it can't synch higher up, this was the "I now forget the specifics" comment I made earlier in this thread. -- David N. Lombard My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
