We discussed here at ORNL yesterday that we will be cleaning up the oscarsamples/ directory to remove sample rpm lists for unsupported distros, so in addition to that, we should probably clean up the packages such that there is no cruft in them... We have agreed that for any particular distro, we support the current version and one version back.
Cheers, Bernard > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Lombard, David N > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 9:31 > To: OSCAR-devel > Subject: [Oscar-devel] RPM audit > > I've attached a binary rpm audit of the trunk. > > Various conventions are used to partition distro-specific packages. > Should we make this consistent? > > Package-specific comments: > > c3 > -python2 for i386? > > hdf5 > -Huh? > -mdk90 > > lam > -ia64 in rh90? > -gm only for rh90/i386? > > maui > -extra maui-oscar-debuginfo > > mpich > -ia64 in rh80? > -mdk90? > > openpbs > -missing ia64. Do we care? > > perl-qt > -no distro-specific dirs? > -libsmokeqt1? > > pvm > -mkd90? > -mdk92? > > sis > -inconsistent versions > > switcher > -env-switcher only in fedora2? > -mkd90? > -mdk92? > > -- > David N. Lombard > > My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation. > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
