From: Geoffroy Vall�e on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 2:45 PM > >Thanks for all the remarks. :-) > >I agree with you, so maybe I can: >1/ Try to integrate my modifications to PackMan using the current >OSCARonDebian version.
Excellent >2/ Audit the code, clean it up and modify it according the new PackMan >(still >in OSCARonDebian), and test it. We all need to work on this. You've probably identified all the ugliness that needs to be fixed, so let's start with that. >3/ Submit to the list my modifications to be sure that the new version is >correct. >4/ If the code seems correct, integrate the new code to OSCAR. I think this will just fall out of the first two items... >I can start with scripts like install_cluster and prereqs. Thinking a little more, the /tftpboot/rpm check properly belongs in the rpm-specific parts of depman initialization. In case you're unaware, the /tftpboot/rpm check long predates the depman/packman abstraction. The abstraction wasn't fully integrated (i.e., it's probably missing some support functions, some of the functionality needs to be rearranged, the code it made redundant hasn't all been removed, and it's not being exploited in new code as it should be). -- David N. Lombard My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
