I think these abstractions should definitely go into trunk - the question to ask though is, can we fit it in 4.2, or should it be included for future releases?
Cheers, Bernard > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jeffrey Squyres > Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 15:31 > To: OSCAR-devel List > Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] [OSCARonDebian] current state and > discussions > > In Apr 27, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Geoffroy Vall�e wrote: > > > Do you think it is a good idea? I don't want to break the > "official" > > OSCAR or > > slow down current developments... > > Per Dave's remarks, I think this *is* current development. > So my $0.02 is that this is worth doing in the trunk and let > the main OSCAR benefit (and allow our sister projects to > benefit as well). > > But I don't want to hose the roadmap -- John, can you weigh > in on this? > > -- > {+} Jeff Squyres > {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] > {+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! > Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net > Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey > Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix > _______________________________________________ > Oscar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
