Le Vendredi 24 Juin 2005 10:28, Jeff Squyres a écrit : > On Jun 24, 2005, at 9:51 AM, Geoffroy Vallée wrote: > > Just a quick question: do you think such a framework can have a > > component to > > detect SSI? I mean a SSI allows to globally manage resources (for > > example > > Kerrighed provides a global scheduler), so it can be interesting to > > have such > > a component. > > After that my only concern is to know if it is interesting to have at > > the same > > time a batch system and the global scheduler of a SSI. It works (i > > tested it) > > but i don't know if it is really interesting. > > Don't you still have a resource manager for an SSI cluster? I would > think that you still want to be able to reserve resources to get > exclusive time, etc. I know that BProc clusters, for example, have > resource managers for exactly this purpose.
Even if the main idea of a SSI to give a blackbox (the user does not know where/when is executed the application), Kerrighed allow to implement any scheduling policy. Unfortunately, such a policy (to reserve resources, ...etc.) is not implemented right now (that's a reason why I am using Torque with SSI-OSCAR). But anyway, a SSI provides some mechanisms for resource management so do we need to include it in the RM_Detect framework? or do you think it is a specific case and using a batch system right now, only batch systems are important for the framework? -- Geoffroy Vallée, Ph.D. SSI-OSCAR (http://ssi-oscar.irisa.fr/) OSCARonDebian (http://ssi-oscar.irisa.fr/oscarondebian/) ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
