I changed the page the sidebar template references to "index" on my test wiki and it works fine. It is an edit to the stock template though, so if it got updated we would have to remember to re-add the change. Would keeping it called "sidebar" seem sensible to you?
The style issues are not to difficult to overcome, just requires shortening some of the section names for the sidebar. This wouldn't have any affect on the pdf, since it doesn't use the formating of the index page anyway, just the list of links. On 8/14/06, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mike: > > We can probably rename it from sidebar -> index, but not sure if this plays > well with DokuWiki. I'm happy as long as I only need to modify one place for > indexing (or just not modify at all and have it auto-generate :) ). > > There are still some small issues to iron out, in terms of how the "sidebar" > will look when it takes the role of index as well... (formatting and the > likes) > > Thanks, > > Bernard > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Michael Edwards > Sent: Mon 14/08/2006 10:50 > To: Oscar-devel List > Subject: [Oscar-devel] no "index" page on the wiki? > > On last weeks call, we discussed briefly a couple options for how to > resolve the current problem in dokuwiki where if you edit the "index" > page after adding new content, you also have to edit the "sidebar" > page so the new page shows up there as well. Bernard suggested simply > not ever displaying the "index" page, but instead just display the > first page of the document with the sidebar. > > I think this is a viable solution, but my question is a bit of > somantics. Do we want to use the default "sidebar" page as the index, > or do we want to change it to be called "index" or something else? > Which would people find easier to remember since it would not ever be > displayed as being editable unless you dropped into the master index > page (the thing with all the little folders most folks find a bit > confusing anyway)? > > I was going to implement this, but I was ambivalent as to which way to > go so I thought I would ask and see if folks had any opinions. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Oscar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Oscar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
