opkg-<package> allows us to install meta-data about the OPKG, it should NOT install RPMs for clients and servers. Please, read again the specification, i think it details that (please also read old discussions on the mailing list about OPKGC).
Quoting Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think the opkg-<package>-server/client packages are also missing the > dependency on opkg-<package> RPM. > > Cheers, > > Bernard > > On 9/28/07, DongInn Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In addition, why are not the > opkg-(package_name)-(number):(version_number).rpm files installed while > opkg-(package_name)-server.(version_number).rpm is installed? > > To be more specific, when wizard_prep is finished, the oscar core packages > are supposed to be installed with all the corresponding oscar meta packages > then. But some core rpms are not installed. For example, normal RPMs for sis > are not installed at all because I think the opkg-sis-sever meta rpm which > was installed for sis during wizard_prep has actually nothing and > opkg-sis-1:3.8.0-2.noarch.rpm containing main information about the sis > package was not installed. > > > > (FYI, my rhel5 box testing with trunk is using the remote repo and local > repo all together.) > > > > Regards, > > > > - DongInn > > > > > > Bernard Li wrote: > > > My understanding is that the opkg meta packages are supposed to have > > > dependencies for the underlying binary packages they are responsible > > > for. > > > > > > This is described in the opkg's config.xml file. However, I do not > > > think the resulting RPMs have the dependencies -- for instance: > > > > > > # rpm -q --requires opkg-sis-server > > > /bin/sh > > > /usr/bin/perl > > > perl(Carp) > > > perl(Config) > > > perl(OSCAR::Database) > > > perl(OSCAR::Distro) > > > perl(OSCAR::OCA::OS_Detect) > > > perl(OSCAR::Opkg) > > > perl(POSIX) > > > perl(lib) > > > perl(strict) > > > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > > > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > > > > > > Shouldn't it require a bunch of systemimager RPMs? Is this a bug with > opkgc? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Bernard > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Oscar-devel mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Oscar-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Oscar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
